CenturyLink Implements the Most Robust Political Spending Disclosure in the Telecommunications Sector
- Discloses processes and procedures for reviewing and approving political expenditures – this will include disclosing the roles and responsibilities of both board members and executives; and disclosing the criteria it uses in making decisions about political expenditures;
- Discloses aggregate data regarding political contributions on a state-by-state basis – with respect to the political expenditures that are aggregated on a state-by-state basis CenturyLink will include (a) independent political expenditures made in support of or in opposition to a candidate or political party and (b) payments made directly or indirectly to influence the outcome of ballot measures;
- Discloses trade association membership and expenditure data, once annual dues and other payments exceed $50,000; and
- Discloses payments to tax-exempt organizations including 501(c)(4)s, super PACs and “unregulated” 527s (e.g., governor’s associations and independent-expenditure only committees, to the extent such 527 entities or organizations are not regulated under state or federal campaign finance laws).
In 2012, shareholders considered the same shareholder proposal filed by Trillium and gave it 41% support, sending a clear message to management that it needed to address concerns about how opaque it was on this question.
This agreement is also an important development for the telecommunications industry. AT&T and Verizon are now political spending disclosure laggards and must now answer questions about why they remain unwilling to join the over 100 large companies with meaningful political spending disclosure.
The telecom industry is now facing critical challenges regarding its control over the free flow of information and calls for greater competition in a highly concentrated market. These issues are not only important to the companies, but given the pivotal role they play in the information economy, they are central to overall economic growth. As legislators, regulators and other policy leaders wrestle with those challenges, investors and the public have the right to know how corporate dollars are spent to influence the political process.