Pentair – Sexual Orientation Non Discrimination Policy
WHEREAS
Pentair does not explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation in its written employment policy;
We believe that corporations that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation have a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining employees from the widest talent pool;
According to the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law, studies since the mid-1990s found that at least one in ten gay men and lesbians experienced workplace harassment or discrimination based on their sexual orientation;
National public opinion polls consistently find that the majority of Americans support equal rights in the workplace for gay men, lesbians and bisexuals:
- According to a September 2005 survey by Harris Interactive and Witeck-Combs, 57% of heterosexual respondents consider it extremely or very important that a company have a written non- discrimination policy that includes sexual orientation, compared to only 43% in 2002. Additionally, only 47% believe that senior executives at their companies welcome, hire, and encourage a diverse workforce.
- A March 2003 Gallup poll found 88% of respondents favored equal opportunity in employment for gays and lesbians.
Nearly 90% of the Fortune 500 companies have adopted written nondiscrimination policies prohibiting harassment and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, as have 98% of the Fortune 100 companies, according to the Human Rights Campaign;
Our competitors Donaldson, Dover, Graco, Harsco, Illinois Tool Works, Tecumseh Products, Tennant and Timken Company explicitly prohibit this form of discrimination in their written policies, according to the Human Rights Campaign;
Eighteen states, the District of Columbia and 171 cities and counties (including Minneapolis), have laws prohibiting employment discrimination based on sexual orientation, and in Minnesota, at least 60 major employers have sexual orientation nondiscrimination policies (see www.hrc.org/worknet);
The State of California and twelve cities, including Minneapolis, San Francisco, Seattle and Los Angeles have adopted legislation restricting business with companies that do not guarantee equal treatment for lesbian and gay employees, and similar legislation is pending in other jurisdictions;
Our company has operations in, and makes sales to institutions in states and cities that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
RESOLVED
The Shareholders request that Pentair amend its written equal employment opportunity policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and to substantially implement the policy.
ExxonMobil – Implement Sexual Orientation Non Discrimination Policy
WHEREAS
ExxonMobil does not explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in its written employment policy;
Over 88% of the Fortune 500 companies have adopted written nondiscrimination policies prohibiting harassment and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, as have more than 98% of Fortune 100 companies, according to the Human Rights Campaign; over 30% now prohibit discrimination based on gender identity;
We believe that corporations that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity have a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining employees from the widest talent pool;
According to a September 2002 survey by Harris Interactive and Witeck-Combs, 41% of gay and lesbian workers in the United States reported an experience with some form of job discrimination related to sexual orientation; almost one out of every 10 gay or lesbian adults also stated that they had been fired or dismissed unfairly from a previous job, or pressured to quit a job because of their sexual orientation;
Minneapolis, San Francisco, Seattle and Los Angeles have adopted legislation restricting business with companies that do not guarantee equal treatment for gay and lesbian employees;
Seventeen states, the District of Columbia and more than 160 cities and counties, including the city of Dallas, have laws prohibiting employment discrimination based on sexual orientation;
Our company has operations in, and makes sales to institutions in states and cities that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation;
National public opinion polls consistently find more than three quarters of the American people support equal rights in the workplace for gay men, lesbians and bisexuals; for example, in a Gallup poll conducted in March, 2003, 88% of respondents favored equal opportunity in employment for gays and lesbians;
RESOLVED
The Shareholders request that ExxonMobil amend its written equal employment opportunity policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity and to substantially implement the policy.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
Employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity diminishes employee morale and productivity. Because state and local laws are inconsistent with respect to employment discrimination, our company would benefit from a consistent, corporate wide policy to enhance efforts to prevent discrimination, resolve complaints internally, and ensure a respectful and supportive atmosphere for all employees. ExxonMobil will enhance its competitive edge by joining the growing ranks of companies guaranteeing equal opportunity for all employees.
Expeditors International – Implement Sexual Orientation Non Discrimination Policy
WHEREAS
Expeditors International does not explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation in its written employment policy;
Our direct competitors EGL and UPS explicitly prohibit this form of discrimination in their written policies; in Washington where Expeditors is headquartered, a number of major employers have this policy, including Microsoft, Starbucks, Safeco, Weyerhauser, Washington Mutual, Costco, Expedia, Nordstrom and others (see www.hrc.org/worklife);
Nearly 90% of the Fortune 500 companies have adopted written nondiscrimination policies prohibiting harassment and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, as have 98% of the Fortune 100 companies, according to the Human Rights Campaign;
We believe that corporations that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation have a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining employees from the widest talent pool;
National public opinion polls consistently find more than three quarters Americans support equal rights in the workplace for gay men, lesbians and bisexuals.
- According to a September 2005 survey by Harris Interactive and Witeck-Combs, 57% of heterosexual respondents consider it extremely or very important that a company have a written non- discrimination policy that includes sexual orientation, compared to only 43% in 2002. Additionally, only 47% believe that senior executives at their companies welcome, hire, and encourage a diverse workforce.
- A March 2003 Gallup poll found 88% of respondents favored equal opportunity in employment for gays and lesbians.
The State of California and twelve cities, including Minneapolis, San Francisco, Seattle and Los Angeles have adopted legislation restricting business with companies that do not guarantee equal treatment for lesbian and gay employees, and similar legislation is pending in other jurisdictions;
Our company has operations in, and makes sales to institutions in states and cities that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation;
Eighteen states, the District of Columbia and 171 cities and counties (including the cities of Seattle, Olympia, Burien and Tacoma), have laws prohibiting employment discrimination based on sexual orientation;
RESOLVED
The Shareholders request that Expeditors International amend its written equal employment opportunity policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and to substantially implement the policy.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT
Employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation diminishes employee morale and productivity. Because state and local laws are inconsistent with respect to employment discrimination, our company would benefit from a consistent, corporate wide policy to enhance efforts to prevent discrimination, resolve complaints internally, and ensure a respectful and supportive atmosphere for all employees. Expeditors International will enhance its competitive edge by joining the growing ranks of companies guaranteeing equal opportunity for all employees.
Sexual Orientation in the Workplace
Advocating for Equality
Polls consistently show that an overwhelming majority of Americans support equal job rights for gay men, lesbians and bisexuals. Fairness is one of our most cherished principles.
Yet only eleven states bar employment discrimination based on sexual orientation, and less than 150 local governments do so. Fewer still protect transgendered workers. In contrast, the private, university and non-profit sectors have taken the lead. Today, over half of the companies in the Fortune 500 (and all but seven of the Fortune 100) include the term “sexual orientation” in their nondiscrimination policies, and about 20% provide domestic partnership benefits to their gay, lesbian and bisexual employees.
States That Prohibit Discrimination Based on Sexual
Orientation in Private Sector Employment
|
| California |
Minnesota |
Rhode Island |
| Connecticut |
Nevada |
Vermont |
| Hawaii |
New Hampshire |
Wisconsin |
| Massachusetts |
New Jersey |
|
| and the District of Columbia. |
| *Minnesota also prohibits job discrimination based on gender identity. |
| Source: Human Rights Campaign. |
What We’re Doing About This Issue
How We Screen
When we consider investing in a company for the first time, Trillium Asset Management considers its reputation regarding fair hiring, and we query companies specifically on their policies affecting lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered workers (e.g., inclusively written nondiscrimination policies, domestic partnership benefits, recognition of LGBT employee groups, etc.). We will avoid investing in companies with egregious, pervasive or longstanding patterns of discriminatory behavior. If problems emerge at a company in which we are already invested, we will engage with management in dialogue to discern how well and how seriously the company is addressing its challenges.
We have taken proactive measures (see below) to persuade companies to implement inclusive nondiscrimination policies and same-sex domestic partnership benefits. Generally, we divest on social grounds only as a last resort if dialogue and shareholder proposals fail to have a positive impact upon corporate behavior.
Dialogue & Shareholder Proposals
Since 1995, through dialogue with corporate managers and the sponsorship of shareholder proposals, Trillium Asset Management has been a leader in pressing corporations to adopt equitable policies for their treatment of gay, lesbians, bisexual and transgendered employees. Our shareholder proposals, sponsored in collaboration with the Equality Project, have spurred several Fortune 500 corporations to implement sexual orientation nondiscrimination policies. In 1996, Trillium Asset Management testified before Congress in support of the federal Employment Nondiscrimination Act (ENDA), which would outlaw employment discrimination based on sexual orientation.
In 2001, Trillium Asset Management is a co-sponsor of a shareholder proposal before ExxonMobil that urges the company to adopt a sexual orientation nondiscrimination proposal. (Prior to the 1999 merger of the two oil giants, Mobil Corporation included “sexual orientation” in its nondiscrimination policy, and extended domestic partnership benefits to its gay and lesbian employees. Post-merger, both policies were rescinded.) Now in its third year before ExxonMobil shareholders, the proposal is also sponsored by the New York City Employee Retirement System, the New York State Common Retirement System, the Human Rights Campaign, and several individual shareholders associated with the Equality Project. Our Action Alert provides a sample letter to send to ExxonMobil, and more ways to support our proposal can be found at the Equality Project’s ExxonMobil campaign page.
Social Issues
At any given time, the social research and advocacy staff of Trillium Asset Management Corporation are actively working on numerous social and environmental issues of concern to our clients. (Please visit our Engagement page to read more about the means we use to influence corporations.)
The categories below link to more specific descriptions of our work on various issues. The information is provided in the form of Adobe Acrobat (PDF) files.
Animal Rights
Environmental Advocacy
Equal Employment Opportunity
Human Rights
Indigenous Rights
Media Responsibility
Sexual Orientation
You can view additional information about each issue by clicking on the Social Issues links in the sidebar on the left.
Adopt Sexual Orientation Nondiscrimination Policy – ExxonMobil
ExxonMobil
Note: A version of resolution has appeared on ExxonMobil’s proxy ballot since 1998. For more information about this shareholder campaign, visit The Equality Project.
WHEREAS: ExxonMobil claims to bar all forms of employment discrimination but its post-merger written policies do not explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation;
Prior to the merger Mobil explicitly prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation in its equal employment opportunity policy;
Our competitors Chevron, Sunoco, Atlantic Richfield, BP Amoco and Texaco explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation;
The hundreds of corporations with non-discrimination policies relating to sexual orientation have a competitive advantage to recruit and retain employees from the widest talent pool;
Employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation diminishes employee morale and productivity;
Our company has an interest in preventing discrimination and resolving complaints internally so as to avoid costly litigation and damage to its reputation as an equal opportunity employer;
San Francisco, Atlanta, Seattle and Los Angeles have adopted legislation restricting business with companies that do not guarantee equal treatment for lesbian and gay employees and similar legislation is pending in other jurisdictions;
Our company has operations in and makes sales to institutions in states and cities which prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation;
A recent National Gay and Lesbian Task Force study has found that 16% – 44% of gay men and lesbians in twenty cities nationwide experienced workplace harassment or discrimination based on their sexual orientation;
National public opinion polls consistently find more than three-quarters of the American people support equal rights in the workplace for gay men, lesbians and bisexuals;
RESOLVED: The Shareholders request the Board of Directors to amend ExxonMobil’s written equal employment opportunity policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and to substantially implement that policy.
STATEMENT: By implementing a written policy prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation, our Company will ensure a respectful and supportive atmosphere for all employees and enhance its competitive edge by joining the growing ranks of companies guaranteeing equal opportunity for all employees.
Implement a Sexual Orientation Nondiscrimination Policy – JC Penney
WHEREAS: JC Penney does not explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation in its written employment policy;
Our industry competitors and peers, Federated Department Stores, May Department Stores, Sears, Nordstrom, and Abercrombie & Fitch, do explicitly prohibit this form on discrimination in their written policies;
More than half of the Fortune 500 companies have adopted written nondiscrimination policies prohibiting harassment and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, as have more than 75% of Fortune 100 companies;
A 2000 study by Hewitt Associates, a compensation and management consulting firm, found that 64 percent of large employers prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation;
The hundreds of corporations with nondiscrimination policies that reference sexual orientation have a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining employees from the widest talent pool;
According to a recent survey by Harris Interactive and Witeck-Combs, 41% of gay and lesbian workers in the United States report facing some form of hostility or harassment on the job; almost one out of every 10 gay or lesbian adults also stated that they had been fired or dismissed unfairly from a previous job, or pressured to quit a job because of their sexual orientation;
Atlanta, San Francisco, Seattle and Los Angeles have adopted legislation restricting business with companies that do not guarantee equal treatment for lesbian and gay employees, and similar legislation is pending in other jurisdictions;
Our company has operations in, and makes sales to, institutions in states and cities that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation;
National public opinion polls consistently find more than three quarters of the American people support equal rights in the workplace for gay men, lesbians and bisexuals; for example, in a Gallup poll conducted in June 2001, 85% of respondents favored equal opportunity in employment for gays and lesbians;
RESOLVED: The Shareholders request that JC Penney amend its written equal employment opportunity policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and to substantially implement that policy.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation diminishes employee morale and productivity. Because state and local laws are inconsistent with respect to employment discrimination, our company would benefit by a consistent, corporate-wide policy to enhance efforts to prevent discrimination, resolve complaints internally, and ensure a respectful and supportive atmosphere for all employees. JC Penney will enhance its competitive edge by joining the growing ranks of companies guaranteeing equal opportunity for all employees.
Implement Sexual Orientation Non-descrimination Policy – TXU Corporation
TXU CORPORATIONWHEREAS: TXU does not explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation in its written employment policy;
Our industry competitors and peers Aquila, Calpine, Cinergy, CMS Energy Services, Consolidated Edison, Entergy, Exelon, FPL Group, Northeast Utilities System, NSTAR, Otter Tail Power, PG&E Corp., Progress Energy, Public Service Enterprise Group and Wisconsin Energy do explicitly prohibit this form on discrimination in their written policies, according to the Human Rights Campaign;
More than half of the Fortune 500 companies have adopted written nondiscrimination policies prohibiting harassment and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, as have more than 75% of Fortune 100 companies;
A 2000 study by Hewitt Associates, a compensation and management consulting firm, found that 64 percent of large employers prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation;
The hundreds of corporations with nondiscrimination policies that reference sexual orientation have a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining employees from the widest talent pool;
According to a recent survey by Harris Interactive and Witeck-Combs, 41% of gay and lesbian workers in the United States report facing some form of hostility or harassment on the job; almost one out of every 10 gay or lesbian adults also stated that they had been fired or dismissed unfairly from a previous job, or pressured to quit a job because of their sexual orientation;
Atlanta, San Francisco, Seattle and Los Angeles have adopted legislation restricting business with companies that do not guarantee equal treatment for lesbian and gay employees, and similar legislation is pending in other jurisdictions, and New York City is considering such legislation;
Our company has operations in, and makes sales to, institutions in states and cities that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation;
National public opinion polls consistently find more than three quarters of the American people support equal rights in the workplace for gay men, lesbians and bisexuals; for example, in a Gallup poll conducted in June 2001, 85% of respondents favored equal opportunity in employment for gays and lesbians;
RESOLVED: The Shareholders request that TXU amend its written equal employment opportunity policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and to substantially implement that policy.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation diminishes employee morale and productivity. Because state and local laws are inconsistent with respect to employment discrimination, our company would benefit by a consistent, corporate-wide policy to enhance efforts to prevent discrimination, resolve complaints internally, and ensure a respectful and supportive atmosphere for all employees. TXU will enhance its competitive edge by joining the growing ranks of companies guaranteeing equal opportunity for all employees.
Sexual Orientation Policy – Emerson Electric
Emerson Electric
WHEREAS: our Company has pledged its commitment to principles of non-discrimination, but has not in its company-wide, written equal employment opportunity policy explicitly barred discrimination based on sexual orientation;
WHEREAS: employment discrimination and the denial of equal benefits on the basis of sexual orientation diminishes employee morale and productivity;
WHEREAS: a National Gay and Lesbian Task Force study revealed that between 16% and 44% of gay men and lesbians in twenty cities nationwide have experienced some form of workplace harassment or discrimination related to their sexual orientation;
WHEREAS: San Francisco, Atlanta and New York have adopted and other jurisdictions are considering adopting legislation restricting business with companies which do not guarantee equal treatment for lesbian and gay employees;
WHEREAS: our Company has operations in and makes sales to public institutions in states and cities, which prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation;
WHEREAS: our Company has an interest in preventing discrimination and resolving complaints internally to avoid costly litigation or damage to our reputation as an equal opportunity employer;
WHEREAS: hundreds of major corporations have adopted sexual orientation non-discrimination policies including General Electric, General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, Boeing, and Coca-Cola, leaving our Company behind;
WHEREAS: national polls have consistently found more than three-quarters of Americans support equal rights in the workplace for gay men, lesbians and bisexuals;
RESOLVED: The Shareholders request the Board of Directors to amend Emerson’s company-wide written equal employment opportunity policy to bar discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Sexual orientation discrimination is a morally wrong and self-defeating business practice. By adopting and implementing a clear and equitable policy, our Company will ensure a respectful and supportive atmosphere for all employees and enhance its competitive edge by joining the growing ranks of major companies guaranteeing equal opportunity for all employees.
Implement Sexual Orientation Nondiscrimination Policy – Exxon Mobil
WHEREAS: ExxonMobil does not explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation in its written employment policy;
Many of our peers, including Amerada Hess, BP, ChevronTexaco, ConocoPhillips, Marathon Oil, Occidental Petroleum, Shell Oil, and Sunoco explicitly prohibit this form of discrimination in their written policies, according to the Human Rights Campaign;
Over 80% of the Fortune 500 companies have adopted written nondiscrimination policies prohibiting harassment and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, as have more than 95% of Fortune 100 companies, according to the Human Rights Campaign;
We believe that corporations that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation have a competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining employees from the widest talent pool;
According to a September 2002 survey by Harris Interactive and Witeck-Combs, 41% of gay and lesbian workers in the United States reported an experience with some form of job discrimination related to sexual orientation; almost one out of every 10 gay or lesbian adults also stated that they had been fired or dismissed unfairly from a previous job, or pressured to quit a job because of their sexual orientation;
Minneapolis, San Francisco, Seattle and Los Angeles have adopted legislation restricting business with companies that do not guarantee equal treatment for lesbian and gay employees;
Fourteen states, the District of Columbia and more than 150 cities and counties, including the city of Dallas, have laws prohibiting employment discrimination based on sexual orientation;
Our company has operations in, and makes sales to institutions in states and cities that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation;
National public opinion polls consistently find more than three quarters of the American people support equal rights in the workplace for gay men, lesbians and bisexuals; for example, in a Gallup poll conducted in March 2003, 88% of respondents favored equal opportunity in employment for gays and lesbians;
RESOLVED: The Shareholders request that ExxonMobil amend its written equal employment opportunity policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and to substantially implement that policy.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation diminishes employee morale and productivity. Because state and local laws are inconsistent with respect to employment discrimination, our company would benefit from a consistent, corporate-wide policy to enhance efforts to prevent discrimination, resolve complaints internally, and ensure a respectful and supportive atmosphere for all employees. ExxonMobil will enhance its competitive edge by joining the growing ranks of companies guaranteeing equal opportunity for all employees.